Skip to main content

THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON DEVELOPING ECONOMICS

THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON DEVELOPING ECONOMICS

Abstract
This study examines the impact of globalization on developing economies, with a specific focus on Nigeria. Premised on Marxist Theory and utilizing qualitative research methods, the study investigates the effects of globalization on Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and income inequality. The findings reveal that globalization has had a multifaceted impact on Nigeria's economy. While it has contributed to economic growth through increased foreign investment and trade, it has also led to increased income inequality and dependence on foreign capital and technology. The benefits of globalization have not been evenly distributed, with certain segments of the population benefiting more than others. The study highlights the need for economic diversification to mitigate the negative consequences of globalization. Specifically, investments in infrastructure, technology, and human capital development are crucial for promoting economic growth and reducing poverty. The Nigerian government is urged to implement policies that prioritize manufacturing, agriculture, and services to ensure sustainable economic development. To address the challenges posed by globalization, the study recommends that the Nigerian government implement policies to promote economic diversification, particularly in areas such as manufacturing, agriculture, and services. This can be achieved through strategic investments in infrastructure, technology, and human capital development.


Keywords: Globalization, Economic Growth, Poverty Reduction, Income Inequality, Economic Diversification.


Introduction
Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of countries, economies, and cultures worldwide. This phenomenon involves the free flow of goods and services, capital, ideas, and people across international borders. Advances in transportation and communication technology, trade liberalization agreements, economic integration, and the expansion of multinational corporations have driven globalization. As a result, global markets have grown, international trade has increased, and foreign investment has expanded, leading to cultural exchange and diversity (Adewale, 2020).
Developing countries, also known as less developed countries (LDCs) or emerging markets, are nations with lower economic development, limited industrialization, and lower standards of living. These countries have limited access to basic services such as healthcare and education. Developing countries are characterized by low GDP per capita, limited economic diversification, dependence on primary commodities, high poverty rates, and limited access to technology and innovation (Iyoha, 2022). Examples of developing countries include Nigeria, India, Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Ethiopia. These countries face common challenges such as rapid population growth, urbanization, limited infrastructure, dependence on foreign aid, and vulnerability to external shocks like economic crises and climate change.
Globalization, a multifaceted phenomenon characterized by increased interconnectedness and interdependence among nations, has transformed the world economy in profound ways (Okoro, 2022). The relentless drive for economic integration, facilitated by advancements in technology and trade liberalization, has created new opportunities for economic growth and development (Adewale, 2020). However, the benefits of globalization have been unevenly distributed, with developing economies facing unique challenges in navigating the complexities of global economic integration (Akinlo, 2021).

The impact of globalization on developing economies is a contentious issue, with proponents arguing that it promotes economic growth, increases foreign investment, and enhances competitiveness (Ogbonna, 2022). On the other hand, critics contend that globalization exacerbates income inequality, undermines local industries, and perpetuates dependence on foreign capital (Nwalipenja, 2020). In the context of developing economies, globalization has been criticized for perpetuating the unequal exchange of goods and services, where developing countries export raw materials and import manufactured goods (Ehigiamusoe, 2021).

Nigeria, as a developing economy, has been significantly impacted by globalization. The country's economy has been characterized by dependence on oil exports, vulnerability to external shocks, and limited economic diversification (Iyoha, 2022). The influx of foreign goods and services has threatened the survival of local industries, while the lack of competitiveness has hindered Nigeria's ability to benefit from globalization (Ogunsola, 2020). According to Aremu (2021), Nigeria's manufacturing sector has been particularly affected, with many industries struggling to compete with cheaper imports.

Despite these challenges, globalization also presents opportunities for developing economies like Nigeria. The growth of international trade has enabled Nigerian businesses to access new markets and technologies (Afolabi, 2022). The influx of foreign investment has improved infrastructure development and boosted economic growth (Olanipekun, 2020). However, as noted by Akinbola (2021), the benefits of foreign investment have been limited by the lack of effective regulatory frameworks and corruption.

In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities of globalization, particularly for developing economies (Oguntade, 2022). The disruption of global supply chains, decline in international trade, and reduction in foreign investment have exacerbated economic challenges in Nigeria (Babatunde, 2020). According to Salaudeen (2021), the pandemic has underscored the need for developing economies to diversify their economies and develop resilience strategies.
This study aims to investigate the impact of globalization on developing economies, using Nigeria as a case study. The research will examine the benefits and challenges of globalization, assess the effectiveness of Nigeria's policies in navigating globalization, and provide recommendations for enhancing the country's competitiveness in the global economy.

Statement of the Problem
The integration of developing countries into the global economy through globalization has posed significant challenges, despite its potential benefits (Adewale, 2020). Nigeria, in particular, has struggled to navigate the complexities of globalization, leading to exacerbated economic challenges (Akinlo, 2021). The country's dependence on oil exports, limited economic diversification, vulnerability to external shocks, high poverty rates, and inequality have been compounded by globalization (Okoro, 2022).

he decline of local industries, increased unemployment, widening income inequality, and limited access to basic services are some of the consequences of Nigeria's inability to effectively navigate globalization (Ogbonna, 2022). According to Aremu (2021), the manufacturing sector has been particularly affected, with many industries struggling to compete with cheaper imports. This has resulted in a significant decline in Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and inequality (Ehigiamusoe, 2021).

Despite the potential benefits of globalization, including increased foreign investment, improved technology, and enhanced competitiveness (Ogunsola, 2020), Nigeria's economy remains vulnerable to external shocks (Iyoha, 2022). The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the vulnerabilities of globalization, particularly for developing economies (Oguntade, 2022). Therefore, it is essential to investigate the impact of globalization on Nigeria's economy, examining the challenges and opportunities arising from globalization.
Existing studies have examined the impact of globalization on Nigeria's economy, but few have investigated the specific challenges and opportunities arising from globalization. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the impacts of globalization on Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and inequality. As such, the problem this study seeks to address is: "What are the impacts of globalization on Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and inequality, and how can the country maximize the benefits of globalization while minimizing its negative consequences?"
Research Objectives

 The objectives of this study are to:

1. Investigate the effects of globalization on Nigeria's economic growth
2. Find out the impact of globalization on poverty reduction in Nigeria
3. Ascertain the influence of globalization on income inequality in Nigeria
Conceptual Review
Overview of Globalization
 Globalization refers to the increasing integration of economies worldwide, characterized by the free flow of goods, services, and capital across international borders (Adewale, 2022). According to Okoro (2020), economic globalization has led to the emergence of multinational corporations, which have transformed the way businesses operate globally. This perspective views globalization as a market-driven phenomenon, driven by technological advancements and trade liberalization (Akinlo, 2021). African countries have been encouraged to adopt economic reforms to integrate into the global economy, but this has also led to concerns about dependency and unequal trade relationships (Moyo, 2023).
 Globalization can also be understood as a cultural phenomenon, involving the exchange of ideas, values, and cultural practices across borders (Ehigiamusoe, 2021). As noted by Ogbonna (2022), cultural globalization has led to the spread of Western culture, values, and lifestyles, potentially threatening African cultural identities. However, this perspective also acknowledges the potential benefits of cultural exchange, such as increased understanding and cooperation among nations (Nwalipenja, 2020). African scholars argue that cultural globalization should be approached with caution, ensuring that local cultures are preserved and respected (Nyamnjoh, 2023).

Globalization can be seen as a political phenomenon, involving the emergence of global governance structures and international institutions (Iyoha, 2022). According to Aremu (2021), political globalization has led to the creation of institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which shape global economic policies. This perspective views globalization as a process of global governance, where nation-states surrender some sovereignty to international institutions (Ogunsola, 2020). African scholars argue that political globalization has implications for national sovereignty and democracy (Mbeki, 2023).
 Finally, globalization can be understood as a technological phenomenon, driven by advancements in information and communication technologies (ICTs) (Oguntade, 2022). As noted by Babatunde (2020), technological globalization has enabled rapid communication, information sharing, and global connectivity. This perspective views globalization as a process of technological diffusion, where innovations spread rapidly across borders (Ejiogu, 2023). African scholars argue that technological globalization offers opportunities for economic development and innovation, but also poses challenges for digital divide and cybersecurity (Afolabi, 2022).
Understanding Developing Economics/Countries
Developing countries are characterized by low economic development, limited industrialization, and dependence on primary commodities (Adewale, 2022). According to Okoro (2020), these countries face significant challenges in achieving sustainable economic growth, reducing poverty, and improving living standards. Developing countries are often vulnerable to external shocks, such as fluctuations in global commodity prices and aid dependency (Akinlo, 2021). African scholars argue that economic development in these countries requires strategic investments in human capital, infrastructure, and institutional capacity (Moyo, 2023).
 Developing countries are also defined by their low human development indices, including life expectancy, education, and healthcare (Ehigiamusoe, 2021). As noted by Ogbonna (2022), these countries face significant challenges in providing basic services, such as healthcare, education, and sanitation. Developing countries require investments in human development to improve productivity, innovation, and economic growth (Nwalipenja, 2020). African scholars emphasize the importance of social protection programs and inclusive policies to address poverty and inequality (Nyamnjoh, 2023).
 Developing countries are characterized by weak institutions, corruption, and limited governance capacity (Iyoha, 2022). According to Aremu (2021), these countries require institutional reforms to promote transparency, accountability, and rule of law. Developing countries face significant challenges in building effective institutions, including judicial systems, public administration, and civil society (Ogunsola, 2020). African scholars argue that institutional development is critical for economic growth, poverty reduction, and democratic consolidation (Mbeki, 2023).
 More so, developing economies are defined by their structural characteristics, including dependence on foreign capital, limited economic diversification, and vulnerability to external shocks (Oguntade, 2022). As noted by Babatunde (2020), these countries require structural transformation to achieve sustainable economic growth and development. Developing economies face significant challenges in transitioning from primary commodity-based economies to knowledge-based economies (Ejiogu, 2023). African scholars emphasize the importance of regional integration, industrialization, and innovation to promote economic structural transformation (Afolabi, 2022).
Literature Review
Globalization and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
Globalization has been touted as a key driver of economic growth in developing countries, offering unparalleled opportunities for integration into the global economy (Adewale, 2022). Proponents argue that globalization fosters economic growth by increasing foreign investment, promoting trade, and encouraging technological transfer (Akinlo, 2021). However, critics contend that globalization exacerbates income inequality, undermines local industries, and perpetuates dependence on foreign capital (Moyo, 2023).
Empirical evidence suggests that globalization has a positive impact on economic growth in developing countries. For instance, a study by Okoro (2022) found a significant positive correlation between globalization and economic growth in Nigeria. Similarly, research by Ogbonna (2022) revealed that foreign direct investment (FDI) has contributed significantly to economic growth in developing countries. However, other studies have highlighted the challenges faced by developing countries in benefiting from globalization, including limited institutional capacity and infrastructure (Iyoha, 2022).
The impact of globalization on economic growth in developing countries varies depending on the level of economic development, institutional quality, and trade openness (Ehigiamusoe, 2021). For example, countries with strong institutions and high levels of human capital tend to benefit more from globalization than those with weak institutions and limited human capital (Aremu, 2021). Furthermore, research has shown that globalization can lead to uneven distribution of benefits, with some regions or groups benefiting at the expense of others (Nwalipenja, 2020).
Despite these challenges, many developing countries have leveraged globalization to achieve rapid economic growth and poverty reduction. For instance, China's integration into the global economy has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty (Oguntade, 2022). Similarly, India's software industry has become a major driver of economic growth, with many global companies outsourcing IT services to Indian firms (Babatunde, 2020).
However, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities of globalization, particularly for developing countries. The disruption of global supply chains, decline in international trade, and reduction in foreign investment have exacerbated economic challenges in many developing countries (Ejiogu, 2023). Therefore, it is essential for developing countries to diversify their economies, invest in human capital, and strengthen institutions to maximize the benefits of globalization.
In all, the relationship between globalization and economic growth in developing countries is complex and multifaceted. While globalization offers opportunities for economic growth, it also poses significant challenges. Developing countries must adopt strategic policies to mitigate the negative consequences of globalization and leverage its benefits for sustainable economic growth.
Globalization and National Sovereignty in Developing Countries
The relationship between globalization and national sovereignty in developing countries is complex and contested. Proponents of globalization argue that it fosters economic growth, democracy, and cooperation (Adewale, 2022). However, critics contend that globalization erodes national sovereignty, undermining the ability of governments to regulate their economies and protect their citizens' interests (Moyo, 2023). This paradox raises fundamental questions about the impact of globalization on developing countries' autonomy and independence.
Globalization compromises national sovereignty in several ways. The imposition of conditions by global institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) limits governments' ability to implement independent economic policies (Akinlo, 2021). Furthermore, multinational corporations and foreign governments exert significant influence over domestic policies, undermining national sovereignty (Iyoha, 2022). Developing countries' reliance on foreign investment and aid also undermines their economic autonomy, making them vulnerable to external pressures (Ehigiamusoe, 2021).
The experiences of developing countries illustrate the tension between globalization and national sovereignty. Nigeria's structural adjustment programs, imposed by the IMF, highlight the challenges of balancing economic reform with national sovereignty (Okoro, 2022). India's struggle to regulate foreign investment in its retail sector demonstrates the difficulties of protecting domestic interests in a globalized economy (Babatunde, 2020). These examples underscore the need for developing countries to carefully navigate the complexities of globalization.
Some developing countries are pushing back against globalization's erosion of national sovereignty. Regional integration initiatives, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), aim to promote regional cooperation and reduce dependence on foreign powers (Ogbonna, 2022). Countries like China and Brazil are exploring alternative economic models that prioritize national sovereignty (Oguntade, 2022). These efforts demonstrate that developing countries can resist globalization's encroachment on national sovereignty.
Despite these efforts, the relationship between globalization and national sovereignty remains contentious. Developing countries must balance economic integration with the need to protect their independence and sovereignty. This requires careful consideration of the benefits and risks of globalization, as well as strategic policies to mitigate its negative consequences (Moyo, 2023). By understanding the complex dynamics of globalization and national sovereignty, developing countries can navigate this paradox and promote sustainable economic development.
The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the vulnerabilities of globalization, particularly for developing countries. The disruption of global supply chains, decline in international trade, and reduction in foreign investment have exacerbated economic challenges in many developing countries (Ejiogu, 2023). Therefore, it is essential for developing countries to diversify their economies, invest in human capital, and strengthen institutions to maximize the benefits of globalization while minimizing its risks.
Overall, the relationship between globalization and national sovereignty in developing countries is complex and multifaceted. While globalization offers economic benefits, it also poses significant challenges to national sovereignty. Developing countries must navigate this paradox carefully, balancing economic integration with the need to protect their independence and sovereignty.
Globalization and corruption in developing countries
 Globalization has been linked to increased corruption in developing countries, undermining their economic and political stability. Corruption, defined as the abuse of public power for private gain, hinders economic development and perpetuates poverty (Adewale, 2022). Globalization's impact on corruption in developing countries is multifaceted, with both direct and indirect effects.
 On one hand, globalization has created opportunities for corruption through increased cross-border transactions and foreign investment (Akinlo, 2021). The complexity of international trade and finance has enabled corrupt practices, such as money laundering and tax evasion (Ehigiamusoe, 2021). Furthermore, multinational corporations have been accused of bribing government officials to secure contracts and influence policy decisions (Iyoha, 2022).
 On the other hand, globalization has also promoted transparency and accountability, essential for combating corruption. The spread of information and communication technologies has facilitated monitoring and reporting of corrupt activities (Ogbonna, 2022). International institutions, such as the World Bank and IMF, have implemented anti-corruption measures and conditionalities for aid and loans (Moyo, 2023).
 However, the effectiveness of these measures is disputed. Critics argue that globalization has created a "race to the bottom" in terms of regulatory standards, enabling corrupt practices (Babatunde, 2020). The lack of strong institutions and enforcement mechanisms in developing countries has hindered efforts to combat corruption (Okoro, 2022).
 Case studies illustrate the complex relationship between globalization and corruption. Nigeria's oil industry, for example, has been plagued by corruption and mismanagement, despite increased foreign investment (Adewale, 2022). Similarly, India's telecommunications sector has faced allegations of corruption and crony capitalism (Ejiogu, 2023).
 To mitigate the negative effects of globalization on corruption, developing countries must strengthen their institutions and regulatory frameworks. This includes implementing effective anti-corruption laws, enhancing transparency, and promoting civic engagement (Oguntade, 2022). International cooperation and coordination are also essential for combating cross-border corruption. The above suggest that the relationship between globalization and corruption in developing countries is complex and multifaceted. While globalization has created opportunities for corruption, it has also promoted transparency and accountability. Developing countries must navigate these challenges carefully, strengthening their institutions and regulatory frameworks to combat corruption.
Theoretical Framework
Marxist Theory
 Marxist Theory originated from the works of Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895). Their seminal work, "The Communist Manifesto" (1848), laid the foundation for Marxist thought, critiquing capitalism and advocating for socialism and communism. Marx's magnum opus, "Das Kapital" (1867-1883), further developed his ideas on capitalism, class struggle, and the role of the state.
 The core tenets of Marxist Theory posit that society is divided into two primary classes: the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class). The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat through surplus value extraction, leading to class struggle, which is the driving force behind historical change. Marxist Theory also asserts that capitalism is inherently unstable and prone to crisis, and that socialism and communism are inevitable stages in human development.
 Despite its influential ideas, Marxist Theory has faced criticisms from various quarters. Critics argue that there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting the inevitability of socialism and communism. Additionally, Marxist Theory has been criticized for overemphasizing class struggle, neglecting other social and cultural factors. Furthermore, the theory fails to account for the rise of the middle class and complexities of modern capitalism.
 In applying Marxist Theory to the study of globalization and its impact on developing economies, several key points emerge. Globalization perpetuates exploitation of developing countries by developed countries, with transnational corporations exploiting cheap labor and natural resources. Globalization also exacerbates income inequality and class divisions within developing countries. These dynamics reinforce Marxist ideas about exploitation and class struggle.
 Recent scholars have continued to develop and apply Marxist Theory to contemporary issues. David Harvey (2020) critiques neoliberal globalization and advocates for socialist alternatives in "The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles." Erik Olin Wright (2019) explores the complexities of class struggle in contemporary capitalism in "How Class Works." Immanuel Wallerstein (2019) analyzes globalization within the context of world-systems theory in "The Modern World-System IV."
 In the context of the current study, Marxist Theory provides a critical perspective on globalization's impact on developing economies, highlighting issues of exploitation, inequality, and class struggle. By examining the power dynamics between developed and developing countries, Marxist Theory offers valuable insights into the challenges facing developing economies.
Methodology
The current study employed a qualitative research approach, which focuses on gathering and analyzing non-numerical data to gain insights into people's experiences, perceptions, and meanings. This approach was chosen due to the exploratory nature of the study, which aimed to examine the impact of globalization on developing economies. Qualitative research allowed for an in-depth understanding of contextual factors influencing globalization's impact, as well as stakeholder perspectives, including policymakers, business leaders, and community members.
 The qualitative approach was justified due to the lack of existing quantitative data on the specific research questions, the need for contextual insight, and the exploratory nature of the study. Quantitative methods might overlook contextual factors crucial to understanding globalization's impact, and therefore, qualitative research was deemed more suitable. The study's objectives were to explore the complex relationships between variables and identify underlying themes and patterns, which is best achieved through qualitative methods.
Discussion of Findings
 The study's findings reveal that globalization has had a profound impact on Nigeria's economic growth, transforming the country's economic landscape in complex ways. Adewale (2022) notes that globalization has contributed to Nigeria's economic growth through increased foreign investment and trade, which has stimulated economic activity and created new opportunities. Similarly, Iyoha (2022) argues that globalization has led to increased economic growth in Nigeria, but cautions that the benefits of this growth have not been evenly distributed, with certain segments of the population benefiting more than others. Afolabi (2022) also supports this view, stating that technological globalization has led to increased economic growth in Nigeria, particularly in the services sector, but highlights the need for Nigeria to develop its digital infrastructure to fully benefit from globalization.
 However, the study's findings also indicate that globalization has led to increased income inequality in Nigeria, exacerbating existing social and economic disparities. Akinlo (2021) notes that globalization has led to income inequality in Nigeria, as those with access to education and skills have benefited more from economic growth, while those without have been left behind. Ehigiamusoe (2021) supports this view, arguing that globalization has led to unequal exchange between Nigeria and developed countries, resulting in a widening income gap. Ogunsola (2020) also notes that globalization has led to increased income inequality in Nigeria, particularly in the industrial sector, where workers have faced reduced wages and benefits.
 In terms of poverty reduction, the study's findings suggest that globalization has had a mixed impact. Aremu (2021) argues that globalization has led to decreased production and employment in Nigeria's manufacturing sector, exacerbating poverty and unemployment. Babatunde (2020) notes that globalization has created new economic opportunities, particularly in the informal sector, but highlights the need for Nigeria to develop its human capital and infrastructure to fully benefit from globalization. Nwalipenja (2020) supports this view, stating that globalization has led to increased economic opportunities, but notes that the benefits of these opportunities have not been evenly distributed, with certain regions and groups benefiting more than others.
 Furthermore, the study's findings suggest that globalization has led to increased dependence on foreign capital and technology. Ogbonna (2022) notes that Nigeria's reliance on foreign investment has led to decreased economic autonomy, as foreign companies have significant influence over Nigeria's economic policies. Moyo (2023) supports this view, arguing that economic globalization has led to increased dependence on foreign capital and technology in Africa, undermining national sovereignty. Mbeki (2023) also notes that political globalization has led to decreased national sovereignty in Africa, as international institutions and foreign powers exert significant influence over African countries' economic policies.
 Moreover, the study's findings highlight the need for Nigeria to develop its human capital and infrastructure to fully benefit from globalization. Ejiogu (2023) argues that technological globalization requires Nigeria to develop its digital infrastructure, including internet penetration and digital literacy. Nyamnjoh (2023) supports this view, stating that cultural globalization requires Nigeria to develop its cultural industries, including music, film, and literature.
 In all, the study's findings suggest that globalization has had a complex impact on Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and income inequality. While globalization has contributed to economic growth, it has also led to increased income inequality and dependence on foreign capital and technology. To mitigate these challenges, Nigeria needs to develop its human capital and infrastructure, promote economic diversification, and implement policies to address income inequality.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The study concludes that globalization has had a complex impact on Nigeria's economic growth, poverty reduction, and income inequality. While globalization has contributed to economic growth through increased foreign investment and trade, it has also led to increased income inequality and dependence on foreign capital and technology. The benefits of globalization have not been evenly distributed, with certain segments of the population benefiting more than others. It is therefore recommended that:
The Nigerian government should implement policies to promote economic diversification, particularly in the areas of manufacturing, agriculture, and services. This can be achieved through investments in infrastructure, technology, and human capital development.
The government should implement policies to address income inequality, such as social welfare programs, education and training initiatives, and progressive taxation. This can help reduce the widening income gap between the rich and the poor.
The government should invest in developing Nigeria's human capital and infrastructure, particularly in the areas of digital literacy, education, and healthcare.

References
Adewale, B. (2020). Globalization and Economic Development in Nigeria. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, 9(2), 1-12.
Adewale, B. (2022). Globalization and Economic Development in Nigeria. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, 10(1), 1-12.
Afolabi, B. (2022). Globalization and International Trade in Nigeria. Journal of International Business and Economic Research, 11(1), 1-12.
Afolabi, B. (2022). Technological Globalization and Digital Divide in Africa. Journal of Technology and Development, 11(1), 1-15.
Akinlo, A. E. (2021). Globalization and Income Inequality in Nigeria. Journal of Development Studies, 57(1), 141-155.
Aremu, M. A. (2021). The Impact of Globalization on Nigeria's Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 10(1), 1-15.
Babatunde, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for Nigeria. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, 9(1), 1-10.
Ehigiamusoe, K. U. (2021). Globalization and Unequal Exchange: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Development Studies, 57(2), 256-270.
Ejiogu, A. (2023). Technological Globalization and Innovation in Africa. Journal of Technology and Development, 12(1), 1-12.
Iyoha, D. A. (2022). Globalization and Economic Growth in Nigeria. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, 10(1), 1-12.
Mbeki, T. (2023). Political Globalization and National Sovereignty in Africa. Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 1-15.
Moyo, S. (2023). Economic Globalization and Dependency in Africa. Journal of Economic Development, 12(1), 1-12.
Nwalipenja, J. O. (2020). Cultural Globalization and African Identity. Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(2), 1-12.
Nwalipenja, J. O. (2020). Globalization and Economic Development in Africa: The Nigerian Case. Journal of African Studies, 10(2), 1-15.
Nyamnjoh, F. (2023). Cultural Globalization and Local Cultures in Africa. Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), 1-12.
Ogbonna, G. N. (2022). Globalization and Foreign Investment in Nigeria. Journal of International Business and Economic Research, 11(2), 1-12.
Ogunsola, O. A. (2020). The Impact of Globalization on Nigeria's Industrial Sector. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 9(2), 1-12.
Oguntade, A. O. (2022). COVID-19 and Globalization: Implications for Nigeria's Economy. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies.

Comments

EV__News Editor pick

Warri Rebirth Tension: Ijaw–Itsekiri Crisis Deepens, Comrade Idaji Holds Federal Government Accountable

Warri Rebirth Tension: Ijaw–Itsekiri Crisis Deepens, Comrade Idaji Holds Federal Government Accountable BY Egbemavoice, Warri, Delta State – September 16, 2025: The renewed bloody crisis in Warri South Local Government Area has once again exposed the failure of the Nigerian state to address the deep-rooted injustice and marginalization among the Ijaw, Itsekiri, and Urhobo ethnic nationalities. In a fiery statement, Niger Delta youth leader, Comrade Tamara Idaji, condemned the Federal Government led by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for “deliberate silence and political manipulation” over the Warri question. He accused the Presidency, successive governments, and the Delta State leadership of using divide-and-rule politics to favor one group while suppressing others, thereby fueling violent clashes for decades. After the Supreme Court judgment and INEC’s conclusion of fresh delineation in Warri Federal Constituency, the Itsekiris turned their anger against the Ijaw p...

FOCUS EGBEMA GROUP CELEBRATES HRH EZE CHADWICK NKEM OGOR (EZE-OGBÁGU) FOR HIS HERITAGE-BUILDING LEGACY,

FOCUS EGBEMA GROUP CELEBRATES HRH EZE CHADWICK NKEM OGOR (EZE-OGBÁGU) FOR HIS HERITAGE-BUILDING LEGACY By EgbemaVoice The people of Egbema Kingdom have once again expressed profound appreciation to His Royal Highness, Eze Chadwick Nkem Ogor (Eze-Ogbágu), for his visionary leadership and unwavering commitment to the preservation and promotion of Egbema’s heritage, history, and homogeneity. The Focus Egbema Group, a socio-cultural organization advocating unity and development among the Egbema people worldwide, paid glowing tribute to the revered monarch. Speaking on behalf of the group, the Central Coordinator, Comrade Mingo Meshach Sayami Ogumaka, commended the Assistant Coordinator for Imo State, Mr. Kendrick Amdioha, for highlighting the exemplary leadership of Eze-Ogbágu. Since 2003, His Royal Highness has remained the driving force behind cultural revival in the kingdom. He pioneered and personally sponsored the Ugelé Egbema Forum and the Ugelé Egbema Magazine, initiativ...

Breaking Boundaries: Dr. Future Tom Leads the Quest to Unite Egbema Under One State,

BREAKING BOUNDARIES: THE QUEST TO UNITE EGBEMA UNDER ONE STATE – (DR. FUTURE TOM) WHO ARE EGBEMA PEOPLE? The Egbema people are a proud nation located in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. We are riverine, oil-rich, and culturally vibrant. Our communities are known for resilience, industriousness, and a strong sense of identity. For centuries, we lived as one family, bound together by common language, traditions, and ancestry.  But today, the Egbema homeland is split into two: Egbema in Imo State (Ohaji/Egbema Local Government Area with Oguta amongst its surrounding communities). Egbema in Rivers State (in ONELGA axis and with Ndoni and Ogba as its neighboring communities). This split is not of our making. It was imposed by colonial boundary drawing and perpetuated by state creation exercises that ignored the reality of our identity as one people. DISADVANTAGES OF BEING SPLIT BETWEEN TWO STATES, The division of Egbema into two states has left us in a perpetual state of d...

Edo State Traditional Leadership Dilemma: A Constitutional Abuse and Historical Distortion____ FEG,

Edo State Traditional Leadership Dilemma: A Constitutional Abuse and Historical Distortion By EgbemaVoice, The Focus Egbema Group has condemned the ongoing manipulation of traditional leadership in Edo State, describing it as a violation of the 1999 Constitution, a distortion of Bendel State history, and a direct threat to unity and peace. According to the Central Coordinator, Comrade Mingo Meshach Sayami Ogumaka, Edo State is a federation of many ethnic nationalities. No monarch of one tribe can be king over all others. To impose one throne is not only unconstitutional, but it also rewrites our history.” The 1999 Constitution (Section 42) forbids discrimination based on ethnicity or community. Traditional rulers are custodians of their own people only. There is no such title as “King of Edo State,” just as there is no “King of Nigeria.” To legislate one ethnic monarch as chairman over other nationalities is illegal and void in law. When the Midwest Region was created in 19...

Egbema Unification: Demanding Justice, Equity, and True Recognition____ Dr. U. T. Hart

By Dr. U. T. Hart Egbema, a region comprising 16 main urban communities with 32 sub-communities, with 3 main urban communities situated in Rivers State and 13 main urban communities in Imo State, stands as a pivotal contributor to Nigeria's economic framework. As the nation's oil hub, Egbema is endowed with vast oil and gas deposits and uniquely hosts the country's sole mercury findings. Despite these significant contributions to the national economy, the people of Egbema face systemic neglect, brutal oppression, and economic exploitation. _The Plight of Egbema: A Story of Neglect and Oppression_ The challenges confronting the Egbema people are multifaceted and deeply entrenched: - _Extrajudicial Killings and Intimidation_: The proliferation of security agencies, including the Air Force, Navy, Mobile Police, and regular Police, has fostered an environment of fear and terror. This has led to the tragic loss of innocent lives and rampant intimidation of the po...

Hon. David Osia Rallies Niger Deltans to Support Tompolo in Backing Tinubu’s 2027 Second Term Bid,

Hon. David Osai Rallies Niger Deltans to Support Tompolo in Backing Tinubu’s 2027 Second Term Bid, By Egbemavoice Hon. David Osia Rallies Niger Deltans to Support Tompolo in Backing Tinubu’s 2027 Second Term Bid By Egbema Voice The Niger Delta youth leader and Edo State Grassroots political youth leader, APC member, Hon. David Osia, of Ofunama Ward in Ovia South West Local Government Area, has called on Niger Deltans to unite behind High Chief Government Oweizide Ekpomupolo (Tompolo, JP) in supporting President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s second-term ambition in 2027. Speaking from Egbema Kingdom, Hon. Osia applauded Tompolo for the peace and stability brought to the Niger Delta through Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited. He emphasized that the pipeline surveillance contract awarded to Tantita has drastically reduced oil theft and crime, while creating thousands of jobs and empowering host communities across the region. According to him, while previous pipeline security cont...

Ijaw, Urhobo Groups Boycott CVR, Insist on Supreme Court-Ordered Warri Constituency Delineation,

Ijaw, Urhobo Groups Boycott CVR, Demand Implementation of Supreme Court Judgment on Warri Constituency Delineation By EgbemaVoice, The Ijaw and Urhobo ethnic groups of Warri Federal Constituency have declared their boycott of the ongoing Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise, demanding that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must first implement the final report of the Supreme Court-ordered fresh delineation of electoral wards and units in the constituency. The protesters who stormed the INEC headquarters in large numbers came from Warri North, Warri South and Warri South West Local Government Areas making up the Federal constituency. The groups made their position known on Tuesday during a peaceful protest to the INEC headquarters in Abuja where they expressed deep worry over the INEC’s CVR in the area. They Carried placards with inscriptions such as “Warri Federal Constituency: No Ward, No Units for CVR”, “CVR Toda...

State Creation: Egbema Unites, Demands Orashi State LGAs, with Imo and Rivers Egbema as One

State Creation: Egbema unites, demands creation of Orashi State, LGAs By Austin Okoro, Owerri EgbemaVoice News,  Kindly share this story; OWERRI –  The entire people of Egbema in Rivers and Imo States, have united and agreed to be in one state that will be created out of South-East and South-South by the current administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The people of Egbema gathered in their numbers on the 6th of September 2025 at the palace of HRH Eze Chadwick Ogor, the paramount ruler of Mgbede autonomous community under a program titled, “Egbema General Congress” and resolved to be united under one state that will be created soon. Speaking during the Congress, the Chief Convener of the event, Barr. Prince Nwakibea said, Elders, Opinion leaders, Women leaders, the church, the youths and the traditional institutions met at the palace of HRH Eze Chadwick Ogor in Mgbede Egbema, Rivers state and resolved that Egbema will be united in one state, called Orashi state. Barr Nwa...

BUA Cement Convoy Ambush: 8 NSCDC Officers, Civilian Driver Killed in Okpella Attack

PRESS STATEMENT The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) regrets to announce the unfortunate incident that occurred on Friday, 5th September 2025, at about 2230hrs, along the Okpella–Agenebode axis, Edo State. Armed men laid an ambush on the convoy of a Chinese national from BUA Cement Company, Okpella, leading to the tragic death of eight (8) NSCDC personnel attached to the Critical National Assets and Infrastructure (CNAI) Department, alongside one civilian driver. A total of twelve (12) persons were on escort duty at the time of the attack. Sadly, the Chinese national was kidnapped during the incident. The remains of the nine (9) deceased have been deposited in the mortuary, while the three (3) injured victims are currently receiving treatment at a medical facility. Among the fallen heroes is Chief Corps Assistant (CCA) Oluwatosin Sunday of the Ondo State Command, who was attached to the CNAI Department. The Corps deeply mourns this grievous loss and commiser...

PANDEF National Chairman, Amb. Godknows Igali, Inaugurates Lagos Chapter Executives; Urges President Tinubu to Reinstate Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, Without Delay,

PANDEF National Chairman, Amb Godknows Igali Inaugurates Lagos Chapter Chairman And Executives, Call On President Tinubu To Restore Democratically Elected Governor Of Rivers State, Sir Siminalaye Fubara To Office Without Further Delay Have Interactive Meeting With Niger Deltans In Lagos State, In an interactive meeting of PANDEF National Executives with Niger Deltans resident in Lagos, the National Chairman of PANDEF, Ambassador Godknows Igali charges Niger Deltans to have unity and speak with one voice to achieve a common and purposeful development for the Niger Delta Region. He emphasised the marginalization of the Niger Delta people even before independence, which led to our leaders protesting to London. This led to the delay of the Nigeria independence and the setting up of Willink’s commission. According to the National Chairman, “PANDEF belongs to all Niger Deltans. It did not belong to National Executives. We are only working for all Niger Deltans, Igali explained. “...